One of the latest Steam reviews: I actually think its quite fair and balanced.
Recommended
1
6.5 hrs on record
EARLY ACCESS REVIEW
Posted: June 8
As an old flyer I owned another lately released flight sim and was curious to compare Aerofly FS2 with the other one (knowing, that the intentions of the two differ a little).
Yes, this is not ment to be a full blown simulator (as the other product). Provided that, I was surprised how many of the systems are implemented in Aerofly FS 2. But many (crucial) systems are not.
Pros:
- nice scenery (good graphic engine!!!); very fluidly on ultra settings; gives a much better sense of flying than other stuttering sims (including recently released ones)
- many nav aids available, including ILS
- good variety of airplanes; well modeled
- acceptable physics
- short loading times
- nice views
- easy flight planning (for unpatient pilots)
Cons:
- some important systems are not implemented (yet)
- no ATC (yet); at least some background chatter would improve the atmosphere highly
- bad sounds (aircraft)
- no real weather (yet?)
- no weather presets
- limited scenery/area (west coast US)
- needs more 3D objects (trees, buildings, etc.)
Conclusion:
For a quick ride this is the right product. Very nice grahpic engine. Dovetail should get together with these guys, regarding the engine. I know that the area to fly is limited. But with the fast loading times and the fluid graphics - even on ultra settings - I see much potential for more. Some systems need to be implemented as quick as possible as they are crucial for the product as it's ment to be used:
- LNAV for all airplanes (since you're not able to fly you flightplan automatically without LNAV); at this time it's only implemented in B747 and B737
- the autopilot needs also be improved on most of the airplanes. For example you're not able to set vertical speed on the Learjet (you have to use shortcuts). NAV mode is mostly not implented; In the B747 you're even not able to tune any radio NAV. Also VNAV would be a nice to have
- more detailed configurations for the main instruments (PFD, ND Lear)
- radio navigation (two NAVs on all modern planes, ADF, etc.)
- Real weather and weather presets
- ability to safe and load flightplans
- ATC chatter (at least, just for the atmosphere)
- AI traffic (you feel very alone in the air)
- better sounds for the aircrafts
- exterior lights should actually emit light!!
I wish to see more scenery, knowing that this means a lot of work. Overall I was surprised by the qualitiy of the product. It seems I expected less. For now Aerofly FS 2 is better than Flight School from Dovetail. Expecially regarding the scenery and graphics engine!! Here you can see where to go in that matter!!! But also the variety of planes is well balanced. The physics are ok. Could be much better for a product which tries to sell itself with the slogan "highly realistic physics".