• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

MSFS CJ4 - N1% Throttle Position / Amount

Currently, I am using the "GENERAL ENG THROTTLE LEVER POSITION:1" variable to get the amount of throttle being used in the CJ4 but the SimConnect values are different than what is displayed in the cockpit.

The CJ4 is showing 77.1 in the cockpit (Working-Title-Mod) and the value I am getting from SimConnect is 64.1.

Either I am using the incorrect variable or I need to apply some math against the returned value? The Unit value in the help text for that field is "Percent". I am stumped. I am getting an Engine Type of "1".

I do see the variable "GENERAL ENG THROTTLE MANAGED MODE" too and I queried that and it came back with 0. But I do not think the CJ4 uses managed mode, but I am not sure about that.

Thanks for your help!
I missed that the SimVarWatcher, "SimVarTokens" has the unit value of "percent scaler 16k" for the "GENERAL ENG THROTTLE LEVER POSITION:1" variable.

So, after Googling for "percent scaler 16k" I come up with nothing on that topic. Doing simple math against the return value, between what is displayed in the cockpit and the SimConnect return value does not work against the whole scale of the throttle from 0 to 100%. At 100% throttle that variable is returning a value that is basically 16,000. But at a value of 8,000 (half) from the return value, it shows 64.8 on the cockpit display...

Could this be a Working-Title-Mod issue that they are displaying an incorrect value? I doubt it! It is Junior-Boi here, doing something wrong.

Here is a picture of what I am talking about if that helps. Notice the 8K return value of 16K scaler, but a 64.8% value shown in the cockpit.

(Ignore the "percent" unit value on the left. That is my first attempt at getting the correct percentage.)
Thanks for that tidbit, ZenMusic. I didn't see anywhere on the net that 16K scaler represents 16383. I will remember that in/for the future.

But, you helped me to look outside of the forest... Those Dang Trees!

The number I am looking for is: "TURB ENG CORRECTED N1:1".

That SimVar is reporting back the correct percentage that matches the CJ4 dead-on.

I have the value I have been searching for. Thanks for your help, Mate!
Uh... I do not believe the PL21 displays corrected N1/N2. Also... throttle position percentage does not equal N1 value. Not sure why you think it should.
I figured out the throttle position percentage is not the same thing as N1. Thanks. I am totally new to this airplane stuff.

I did just make a flight in the CJ4 and using the CORRECTED value seems to match the displayed percentage. Are you thinking it is the "TURB ENG COMMANDED N1" variable instead?
I just double-checked it.

Using the "TURB ENG CORRECTED N1:1" matches the output on the dash of the CJ4. The "TURB ENG COMMANDED N1" version is about 1.5 percent less.
There is no such variable.

There is corrected N1 and uncorrected N1. If the PL21 in the CJ4 is displaying corrected N1... it is incorrect. The real aircraft does not display corrected N1/N2 values, it displays uncorrected N1/N2 values.
My bad, sorry Warp. I was starting to see variables all over the place last night.

hr = SimConnect_AddToDataDefinition(hSimConnect, DEFINITION_ID_AP, "TURB ENG CORRECTED N1:1", "percentage"); // N1 POSITION

I'm not sure about the CJ4 using corrected or uncorrected, IRL or the MSFS default CJ4. The Working-Title plane matches using the code I have above. I will try the uncorrected value to see if it returns the same result in the Working-Title variant.

Thanks for correcting me!
If they have the PL21 using the corrected values, that would be odd. I don't recall any of the Citation business jets displaying corrected N-values.
Possible tomorrow I can revisit this in the CJ4. I will compare what values both SimVars return in relation to what the dashboard has to say. That will give us a conclusive answer. :)
As I suspected. It looks like the Working Title CJ4 is using the Corrected N1 variable. In the last image (70% Throttle setting) there is a slight rounding difference going on between the two numbers.

I am using the correct variables - right? Or is there something else that I should use?

Throttle 0.jpg

Throttle 40.jpg

Throttle 70.jpg
I have sent a PM in the MSFS forum to the pilot who has worked with their project. Hopefully, they will take a look at it and let us know what the issue is on that.

Thanks, Warp!

Roy Holmes

Resource contributor
If you want to understand what corrected means in the context of engine performance go have a trawl in the Aircraft Design Flight dynamics forum or download "FS Thrust vs Altitude calculations" from page 11 of the Resources part of this website. I have a nasty feeling that the MSFS team may have abandoned that method which could explain why a lot of their engine stuff is somewhat off
I will head over there and have a look, Roy! Thanks for that pointer (non-NULL).

Being that this is a "sim" and they do not have any way of measuring everything like you can in the real-world, sacrifices must or could be made. This may be one of those situations.

I haven't tested the N1 percent in any of the other Jets yet and will. This still, maybe just a WT-CJ4 issue.