Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.
By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.
You have superimposed the textures of the sign images over the textures of the building. They are a very small distance apart and as your view distance increases, the difference between the distance to the sign and the distance to the building diminishes to the point that the fixed decimal calculations superimpose each on the occasion of "rounding up." 2.5 is further away than 2.499999, but 2.49999995 rounds up to 2.5 so the render engine tries to display both, while 2.4999994 will render as 2.499999, allowing it to display in front of something 2.5 away.
Hi,You have superimposed the textures of the sign images over the textures of the building. They are a very small distance apart and as your view distance increases, the difference between the distance to the sign and the distance to the building diminishes to the point that the fixed decimal calculations superimpose each on the occasion of "rounding up." 2.5 is further away than 2.499999, but 2.49999995 rounds up to 2.5 so the render engine tries to display both, while 2.4999994 will render as 2.499999, allowing it to display in front of something 2.5 away.
Hi,Hello....
Without seeing the model along with the textures, it's hard to know exactly what it causing the flicking... one thing it could be is multiple polygons laying side by side of each other; conflicting or fighting with each other. Also, could be the textures themselves, such as the format used for the textures. How does the model appear within SketchUp?
Sorry . . . I mean flickering. I think I have solved it in SU. Using the above advice. I deleted the rectangle, started again and removed the front panel to remove the conflict. Not really sure how I did it . . . But I did lolCraig, you've jumped from flicker to fuzziness. The fuzziness is caused by texture resolution and this is the consequence of expanding any media, except vector based elements, which stay at the intended crispness. You have to have a larger starting image or you have magnify it less to conceal the transition between colors that is present in ALL images. If you look at the words "radio active" in your original image, the fuzziness is present but unnoticed due to the small size.