Is this better or worse than vim on Linux?
A common joke is that vim is only frequently used because nobody knows how to exit it.
(And it really is more complicated than being trapped in the pharao's pyramid.)
Spartan simplicity comes to mind. How about low overhead. C: /dir, who needs all those folders when you have directories.
Technically, it's "dir C:\".
Until Windows 10, I was a huge fan of Blackbox4Windows, a shell replacement that took up only 1/8th of the memory of the standard Explorer shell and consisted of not much more than a taskbar and a right click context menu. It was beautifully straight to the point. On Linux, I've used Xfce, which was mildly more sophisticted than BB4Win but still very light weight.
At some point, with increasing amounts of available system RAM and less "waste no megabyte paranoia" both felt somewhat tacked on and integrated to a low degree, so I ditched them for more standard solutions (Metro and Plasma respectively) that may use mildly more resources, but feel more solid and integrated. It improved my user experience tenfold.
Yet, I still run my OS update commands from terminals because of advanced laziness (too many clicks to navigate the menus).