• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

Self-shadowing on FSX aircraft: the secret is revealed!

owenhewitt

owenhewitt

Messages
70
Country
us-southcarolina
Well, I couldn't resist not knowing anymore about self-shadows on aircraft, and I wrote to Adrian Woods for the answer. Here is what he wrote:

"If you’re working with aircraft, we are using a different method of self-shadowing (shadow mapping) that doesn’t require manifold objects. It’s not quite as high fidelity as the volume shadows, but it works for aircraft and doesn’t require the thousands of extra polygons that are needed to manifold the geometry. I’m not sure how you toggle between the two. I’ll have to check on that."

I remember having a conversation with Peter Zahn, also an ACES developer, about this several months back. He was hoping for shadow mapping to become a reality, as he was having a lot of trouble getting good results with manifold volume shadowing on complex aircraft such as the Goose.

Hurray!!

Owen
 
This is nice to know. It would be great if Adrian or some of the other ACES devs would be able to post on these forums.
 
I'm trying :) They are all on a holiday right now...
 
Has anyone successfully exported a fully functioning aircraft with working self-shadowing using the SDK as it currently stands?
 
Holiday my a^$..... ;)

We're busy working on the SDK update, which should be available sometime next week. It's going to include a whole bunch of new updates and all of the Gmax tools. It will also include a sample airplane and an airplane creation doc as well as full documentation with examples of the FSX Material.
 
I'll add my thanks, as well.

I definitely like the presentation of the FS-X SDKs released so far.
 
Torgo3000 said:
We're busy working on the SDK update, which should be available sometime next week. It's going to include a whole bunch of new updates and all of the Gmax tools. It will also include a sample airplane and an airplane creation doc as well as full documentation with examples of the FSX Material.
Click to expand...

Wow excellent news Adrian thanks :cool: :)
 
Torgo3000 said:
We're busy working on the SDK update, which should be available sometime next week. It's going to include a whole bunch of new updates and all of the Gmax tools. It will also include a sample airplane and an airplane creation doc as well as full documentation with examples of the FSX Material.
Click to expand...

Holiday my a^$ - hahaha!! Thanks for the update, Adrian!

Best,

Owen
 
Hi,

Thanks for the update! I'm eagerly awaiting FS X to drop through the letterbox. :D

Best regards,
Robin.
 
Wow... what great news, after the Paderborn Flightsim weekend. Many thanks, Adrian. :)
a013.gif
 
Hello guys!

First, I'm really happy such site released, congrads to administration! - I miss such site for many years :)

About the subject - I do belive that, team used stensil shadows technology in FSX, that means that we should do geometry of the model without "open edges", mistery to me why there are no word about that in SDK :confused:
Btw, some more about stensil shadows could be found here: http://www.gamedev.net/reference/articles/article1873.asp

Still not clear to me
- what should be closed - all geometry of model or just details which will be used in produsing\showing shadows ?
- will we have self-shadows in VC ?

I'm really hope that comming FSX gmax SDK will give me the answers.

sorry for my pure English
 
Andrey Tsvirenko said:
Hello guys!

First, I'm really happy such site released, congrads to administration! - I miss such site for many years :)

About the subject - I do belive that, team used stensil shadows technology in FSX, that means that we should do geometry of the model without "open edges", mistery to me why there are no word about that in SDK :confused:
Btw, some more about stensil shadows could be found here: http://www.gamedev.net/reference/articles/article1873.asp

Still not clear to me
- what should be closed - all geometry of model or just details which will be used in produsing\showing shadows ?
- will we have self-shadows in VC ?

I'm really hope that comming FSX gmax SDK will give me the answers.

sorry for my pure English
Click to expand...

Hi Andrey,

ACES artists had originally wanted all aircraft objects to require volumetric shadowing, or essentially what you've described above as stensil shadows, but they found that very complex objects were not being rendered properly, so the development team incorporated shadow maps to allow the artists some relaxation with regard to polygon counts. Some default aircraft do use volumetric though - the C172 I believe exhibits this.

So, you do not have to have closed objects to have shadows. I do not believe we will see self-shadows in the VC due to it being a huge performance hit.

Best,

Owen
 
Aha... okay Owen, thank you for answer, it makes situaion bit clear :) I'm looking forward for sample aircraft model :) Seems it was promised :)

Comparing with FS9 there is not much difference between polygons count in exterior and VC, so shadows in VC may be provided... would be cool thing I think :rolleyes: ... but... their choice for sure :)
 
Andrey Tsvirenko said:
Aha... okay Owen, thank you for answer, it makes situaion bit clear :) I'm looking forward for sample aircraft model :) Seems it was promised :)

Comparing with FS9 there is not much difference between polygons count in exterior and VC, so shadows in VC may be provided... would be cool thing I think :rolleyes: ... but... their choice for sure :)
Click to expand...

Yes, there should be an example aircraft provided.

It's not so much the polygon count within the VC that is holding back the performance hit of self shadowing objects there, as it is more the fact that you have gauges present which are quite taxing on performance. The combination of the two - you would hear much more complaints about performance that you see now.

Best,

Owen
 
Hi guys, one quick question.
If i'm correct, the example aircraft will be available as a download from the Fsinsider web site, am i right?
 
Actually it seems that there is no secret at all with aircraft self shadowing. :D

I am eagerly waiting for the SDK to clear things up about materials, and all these settings and options the "FSX material" has.

Today as I was experimenting importing my aircraft to FSX I realized that by just replacing the default materials in the scene with "FSX materials", self shadowing on the model works:
 

Attachments

  • FSX-mat-test_1.jpg
    FSX-mat-test_1.jpg
    97.9 KB · Views: 940
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top