- Messages
- 3
- Country

Hi All,
I'm wondering about the interface to FMCs this morning, such as the ones offered by Project Magenta, among others. As a blind user, I find the default display methodology they use to be very inaccessible.
It strikes me that a majority of "programming," the FMC seems to be a largely text-based process, however. You can use soft-keys to make menu selections, but you end up doing a lot of keyboard input, and the screen displays (admittedly cryptic) information in textual form quite a bit.
I'm wondering how practical it would be to make an alternate UI for some of these simulations? I'm currently trying to find a way to fly SIDs and Stars, and an FMC or GPS add-on of some sort seems to be one solution.
If I could read the interfaces used by any of these products, be they stand-alone programs or in-sim gauges, I could have a much more realistic sim experience, which is my ultimate goal.
Thanks for any thoughts
I'm wondering about the interface to FMCs this morning, such as the ones offered by Project Magenta, among others. As a blind user, I find the default display methodology they use to be very inaccessible.
It strikes me that a majority of "programming," the FMC seems to be a largely text-based process, however. You can use soft-keys to make menu selections, but you end up doing a lot of keyboard input, and the screen displays (admittedly cryptic) information in textual form quite a bit.
I'm wondering how practical it would be to make an alternate UI for some of these simulations? I'm currently trying to find a way to fly SIDs and Stars, and an FMC or GPS add-on of some sort seems to be one solution.
If I could read the interfaces used by any of these products, be they stand-alone programs or in-sim gauges, I could have a much more realistic sim experience, which is my ultimate goal.
Thanks for any thoughts

