• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

Feature Request - Attachpoints Listing

Messages
1,361
Country
scotland
Hi Folks

Arno -
Could you please incorporate an output
listing all attachpoints in a model.

Many thanks
ATB
Paul
 
Hi Paul,

Sounds like a good idea, I'll put it on the list.

What do you want to use this for exactly? Understand that would help me in providing better output for you. You expect to get a TXT file with a list of all attachpoints or just a list of them displayed in the tool or ...
 
HiFolks

What do you want to use this for exactly?

Understand that would help me in providing better output for you.

You expect to get
a TXT file with a list of all attachpoints

or just a list of them displayed in the tool

or ...
Arno -

A TXT file of the selected model's
ALL possible attachpoints
would be the preferred method.

Inclusion of those atachpoints already utilised,
and their attached effects, (or whatever),
would be even better. (Speak to JK).

Including the model's NAME and GUID
would be further appreciated. (Again speak to JK).



Personal primary use would be for
identifying attachpoints suitable for mission creation.

Others might find further use. :D



This faciility would much enhance
the assesssment of any new model's
suitability for mission utilisation.

Ranking as high-priority on your list
would brvery much apprecited.



HTH
ATB
Paul
 
Last edited:
OK, understood.
 
Back
Top