- Messages
- 69
- Country
using the new variables, how would you model an aircraft with no mechanical steering available - totally free castoring wheel ?
max_speed_full_steering = x ; Defines the speed under which the full angle of steering is available (in feet/second).
max_speed_decreasing_steering = y ; Defines the speed above which the angle of steering stops decreasing (in feet/second).
min_available_steering_angle_pct = z ; Defines the percentage of steering which will always be available even above max_speed_decreasing_steering (in percent over 100).
max_speed_full_steering_castering = w ; Defines the speed under which the full angle of steering is available for free castering wheels (in feet/second).
max_speed_decreasing_steering_castering = r ; Defines the speed above which the angle of steering stops decreasing for free castering wheels (in feet/second).
min_castering_angle = 0.04236 ; Defines the minimum angle a free castering wheel can take (in radians).
max_castering_angle = 3.14159265358979 ; Defines the maximum angle a free castering wheel can take (in radians).
plus the required , which I set to 180 degrees...
point.0 = 1, -10.5, 0, -2.08, 750, 0, 0.523, 180.0, 0.114, 2, 0.7, 0, 0, 0, 165, 165, 2
I interpret the variables in such a way that those not mentioning "castering" should refer only to the cases where some sort of mechanical interconnection exists between the tailwheel and the rudder, while those that have "castering" in their name refer to "free castering" tailwheels ?
So, if I want to model an aircraft where no links exist between the talwheel and the rudder controls I would make:
x = 0 ; because I don't want to be able to steer directly using a rudder control interlink
y = 0 ; or a very high value, way above takeoff speed ?
z = 0.0 ; because I don't want any steering available whatsoever ( mehanically )
w = value_of[takeoff speed + 10] ; What do you think ?]
r = 0 ; I want to have full castering steering capabilities right from brakeoff
min and max catering angles can be left that way, and in point.0 I set the 8th field to 280, to allow the wheel to swevel 140 º either side ( should I set it to 180 º instead ? )
Thx for any sugestions / comments ...
max_speed_full_steering = x ; Defines the speed under which the full angle of steering is available (in feet/second).
max_speed_decreasing_steering = y ; Defines the speed above which the angle of steering stops decreasing (in feet/second).
min_available_steering_angle_pct = z ; Defines the percentage of steering which will always be available even above max_speed_decreasing_steering (in percent over 100).
max_speed_full_steering_castering = w ; Defines the speed under which the full angle of steering is available for free castering wheels (in feet/second).
max_speed_decreasing_steering_castering = r ; Defines the speed above which the angle of steering stops decreasing for free castering wheels (in feet/second).
min_castering_angle = 0.04236 ; Defines the minimum angle a free castering wheel can take (in radians).
max_castering_angle = 3.14159265358979 ; Defines the maximum angle a free castering wheel can take (in radians).
plus the required , which I set to 180 degrees...
point.0 = 1, -10.5, 0, -2.08, 750, 0, 0.523, 180.0, 0.114, 2, 0.7, 0, 0, 0, 165, 165, 2
I interpret the variables in such a way that those not mentioning "castering" should refer only to the cases where some sort of mechanical interconnection exists between the tailwheel and the rudder, while those that have "castering" in their name refer to "free castering" tailwheels ?
So, if I want to model an aircraft where no links exist between the talwheel and the rudder controls I would make:
x = 0 ; because I don't want to be able to steer directly using a rudder control interlink
y = 0 ; or a very high value, way above takeoff speed ?
z = 0.0 ; because I don't want any steering available whatsoever ( mehanically )
w = value_of[takeoff speed + 10] ; What do you think ?]
r = 0 ; I want to have full castering steering capabilities right from brakeoff
min and max catering angles can be left that way, and in point.0 I set the 8th field to 280, to allow the wheel to swevel 140 º either side ( should I set it to 180 º instead ? )
Thx for any sugestions / comments ...
Last edited: