• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

Need help with interpretation

Thank you for your help Yves! I'd say it's not as important to be formally correct in terms of mathematical notations. It's always better to express things as if you were talking to a retard. Using formal notations is a great way of expressing equations but it requires a lot of reading if you don't have an adequate math education.

I have a senior high school edication in physics, math, chemistry and other science oriented subjects. Therefore my ability to understand equations is good enough to get me through a lot of math-stuff. Math notation is something I'm not good at. My point here is that you don't necessarily need to know math notation to be able to comprehend the concepts of math.

If your target audience is those who has a higher education than say me, then formal notation is probably best way to go. However for a broader audience, I'd say a slightly lower/simpler level of formal notations might be the better option. The steady state derivatives could be expressed as simple variables. For example: CL_de + CL_de_M. You would only need to explain how you get those variables from the relevant tables.

I'm probably ignorant but those are my thoughts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top