- Messages
- 217
- Country

I have a funny situation here - hope my physics teacher from school doesn't read it... 
I am reading this presentation on jet aircraft performance from a seemingly reliable source. Particularly, the equation for power available (Pa) on slide 12 shows:
Now I'm confused as far as the conversion from Newtons to Watts is concerned since the former represents a value of force while the latter is a quantity of job performed in a definite period of time. In this case, however, they both have the same value...
He then uses the conversion value in calculating excess power (Pex):
But since Pr (see: slide 9) is a function of weight (W) in Newtons, any weights in the first part of equation (i.e., to find Pa) must also be converted to Newtons to ensure compatibility.
So, what is right - thrust in Newtons or N-m/s (or, lbs-ft/s)?!
And is this the proper method of converting HP to force? (eg., C172R): 160 BHP * 550 ft-lbs/s * 0.454 kg/ft * 9.81 m/s2 ~ 392 kN
Thanks!
I am reading this presentation on jet aircraft performance from a seemingly reliable source. Particularly, the equation for power available (Pa) on slide 12 shows:
Pa = V * Thrust, where T = 567,000 Newtons = V * 567,000 in Watts
Now I'm confused as far as the conversion from Newtons to Watts is concerned since the former represents a value of force while the latter is a quantity of job performed in a definite period of time. In this case, however, they both have the same value...
He then uses the conversion value in calculating excess power (Pex):
Pex = Pa - Pr
But since Pr (see: slide 9) is a function of weight (W) in Newtons, any weights in the first part of equation (i.e., to find Pa) must also be converted to Newtons to ensure compatibility.
So, what is right - thrust in Newtons or N-m/s (or, lbs-ft/s)?!
And is this the proper method of converting HP to force? (eg., C172R): 160 BHP * 550 ft-lbs/s * 0.454 kg/ft * 9.81 m/s2 ~ 392 kN
Thanks!
