• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

SDK Resample: NullValue turns unwanted area black

dave hoeffgen

Resource contributor
Messages
1,439
Country
germany
To reduce the size of photoreal files I included the following line to leave out the pixels that are zero in the blend mask:

Code:
NullValue = ,,,,0

Unfortunately instead of being invisible the pixels in question are black in the result (sim and TmfViewer)
When I leave the line out the result looks the way it should but with lots of unneeded data (and some fully transparent bgl files)

Does anybody have an idea?
 
Hi,

I use this approach as well and it works for me. Let me check if I have other settings, since it was a struggle to get this working well with blend and water masks.
 
I also used this setup before with no issues until now, so I am confused.
I triple checked that the number of commas was right (four as blend is the fifth channel), I just checked that it has nothing to do with the inf being split into multiple files (source and destination),
and as it shows correctly without the line in question I am sure I didn't confuse water and blend channels.
I can't really think of anything else...
 
Back
Top