Table 404 or alternatively table 1545 gives CL versus AOA in radians. Few points about the tables:
AOA is fuselage AOA. The program does not take wing incidence into play, so you need to allow for wing incidence when entering CL data against AOA.
The program calculates CL by interpolating between AOA values. Ideally you need to have a data point for the AOA where CL is zero and another at least 10 degrees AOA above that value.
The slope of the straight line CL vs AOA part of the curve is output as A:LINEAR CL ALPHA, number and it is in CL per radian.
The AOA where CL is zero is output as A:ZERO LIFT ALPHA, degrees (or radians, your choice)
In FSX there is only one table for CL versus AOA, whereas in real airplanes the relationship will vary throughout the envelope.
Flaps add lift and have the effect of lifting the curve upwards, but the slope is not affected.
Leading edge flaps, which in real life extend the length of the curve to higher AOA, just add lift same as trailing edge flaps in the sim.
Table 401 gives a scalar on CL according to Mach, and it has the effect of locally increasing lift in the same way as flaps, ie no slope change.
Flaps in real life change the stalling AOA, but not so in the sim. Stall AOA is the highest positive value anywhere on the curve and is output as A:STALL ALPHA, degrees (or radians)
So given all that, there is no "speed at which I have to define the lift coefficient". You need to know the wing incidence, the wing zero lift AOA and the clean wing lift slope.
Roy