• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

MSFS20 Saab MFI-17 "Mushshak (The proficient)"

Yes, users complain before and after. That’s life! As a developer, which complaint (before or after) should a developer concern his/herself with? That's the question. It's not easy but developing anything can be fun and sometimes, financially rewarding - if you're good at it.
 
what do you guys think about this red light?

1.jpg


or ...

1.jpg
 
Last edited:
I have never been in the aircraft in real life so my opinion is entirely subjective, to me it seems like option 1 may be closer to a real life red light.

Option 2 has its advantages of course in practical use as it lights up the entire cockpit more.

Can't we have both? (JUST kidding of course, couldn't help it, sorry!). :p
 
I have never been in the aircraft in real life so my opinion is entirely subjective, to me it seems like option 1 may be closer to a real life red light.

Option 2 has its advantages of course in practical use as it lights up the entire cockpit more.

Can't we have both? (JUST kidding of course, couldn't help it, sorry!). :p

haha, same feelings here but it's quite hard to read the gauges with the monitor screen and option 1 whereas in option 2 the light is a little less harsh on your eyes!
 
I made a few changes in external and internal models. Waiting for the aircraft manual and procedures. Working on the sounds and textures. I hope you guys like the new project logo! :p

1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
5.jpg
6.jpg
4.jpg
 
Last edited:
I can't help noticing that the engine gauges don't look right...

5_1.jpg


It's nitpicking really, but the "needle covers" are curved in the photo, but straight in your screenshots. Is this on purpose?
 
oh i get it... it took me a while to understand what you meant .. the aircraft I took the photos of had straight covers..... except for the fuel quantity gauge.... i think you guys can live with that?
 
Well, I don't speak for everybody, but I'm pretty sure we can live with it, since nobody else seemed to noticed it before ;)
 
Wow, such commitment to the community! Remind me to buy this piece of art when it's released! ;)
 
If I might add my three-cents worth, might I suggest that you use the "Additive" emissive mode for the "glass displays" of the avionics? That way they will be lighted during the dawn, day, dusk and night, as long as there is electrical power.
 
If I might add my three-cents worth, might I suggest that you use the "Additive" emissive mode for the "glass displays" of the avionics? That way they will be lighted during the dawn, day, dusk and night, as long as there is electrical power.

Let's try it then... nothing better to do then try new things! :P
 
Back
Top