- Messages
- 3,371
- Country

Hi Martin,
nice and fast work. Thanks.
Here is a Picture from the Window.
Did you see the same?
Surely not
Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.
By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

Hi Martin,
nice and fast work. Thanks.
Here is a Picture from the Window.
Did you see the same?


Martin
I am running Vista 32/SP1 in mode 1024 by 768. I will check also the dirty code since I see the same screen issue as Sandra


Welcome to the world of freeware utility development. Wait until you make it generally available!There were so many new feature requests coming in that I just added these without much consideration of optics, aesthetics and ergonomics. So the program was deteriorating below any acceptable standard in this regards.
I urge you once again not to use the .air file to control whether or not the AI variants are displayed in the Select Aircraft window. First of all, that selection applies to all variants in the aircraft.cfg file, whether or not for AI use. If someone uses that airfile for another aircraft (not an infrequent occurence among AI developers), it could take them a long while to figure out why their new aircraft won't display in the Select Aircraft window if you have so modified it. This capability is not well-known. I know of no other utility that includes it and the setting is not otherwise apparent. While I'm sure AI Aircraft Editor will appear on most FS-users' desktops, I suspect the effects of this feature will be frequent topics in your support forum. It appears you can acomplish the same thing for both FS9 and FSX by commenting-out the "ui_" items for the individual variants. (My last words on the subject.)
(My last words on the subject.)

[*]Currently, you use the combobox beside the FS9 and FSX radio buttons to quick-select the FSX\SimObjects sub-folder. It has no apparent purpose for FS9 (and still displays the FSX folder-set). Yesterday, I thought you were using it to allow manual selection of the FS9/FSX path - until you set me straight. You may wish to reconsider. FSX folder selection is easily done from the folder tree and likely will be an infrequent occurence. On the other hand, if Microsoft changes the registry location for the FS9 and FSX base folders in its next 64-bit operating system (as it did with Vista), your application will be unuseable with that operating system. Using this area for manual selection of the path to FS if your app. doesn't find it automatically would avoid that potential difficulty.
[*]What is the purpose of the multi-line text box in the lower-left-hand corner which now displays the name of the .air file. Is it still needed now that you handle the .air file on the mt&a tab?
[*]I urge you once again not to use the .air file to control whether or not the AI variants are displayed in the Select Aircraft window. First of all, that selection applies to all variants in the aircraft.cfg file, whether or not for AI use. If someone uses that airfile for another aircraft (not an infrequent occurence among AI developers), it could take them a long while to figure out why their new aircraft won't display in the Select Aircraft window if you have so modified it. This capability is not well-known. I know of no other utility that includes it and the setting is not otherwise apparent. While I'm sure AI Aircraft Editor will appear on most FS-users' desktops, I suspect the effects of this feature will be frequent topics in your support forum. It appears you can acomplish the same thing for both FS9 and FSX by commenting-out the "ui_" items for the individual variants. (My last words on the subject.)
You are using at least two font sizes in the various text boxes which, incidentally, are taller than necessary. If you standardized on the smaller font (which seems quite adequate) and re-size the text boxes, you could substantially reduce the height of your main screen (which solves half your problem with users with lo-res monitors).
- Could you display the currently assigned model, texture and .air files for the selected AI variant without requiring the user to click the "fltsim.x" label
- Why do you need the "selected [fltsim.x] title" column? Isn't it always going to be the same as the item selected in the main listbox? If not, use of this page could get quite confusing.
- The title for the .air file section is "currently assigned flight model". While this is not incorrect, you refer to it as "Airfile" on the tab header. To avoid confusion, why not use "Airfile" (or whatever) in both places.
- The three buttons in the lower righthand corner of this tab become enabled even if there is only a single option available - and, hence, nothing to change.
[*]Do you need both text boxes and combo boxes for display of model, texture and air files? A combo box normally displays the currently selected item in its text field, making the text box above it superfluous.

If this is your last words on the subject then please link me to your first words.
If I am missing the pro's and con's to what the .air file is for I would like to see what else you had to say.
I didn't suggest removal, but rather, commenting them out for that very reason.Removing the UI's removes the name of aircraft from the selection list but the UI is also the tags used by all modlers to place their design name such as Arrdvark, AIG, TFS, etc. and logo's.
I was not referring to a new version of FS but, rather, to the Vista replacement OS now in beta and due for release in less than a year.I think that for the time being we won't see any new FS version any time soon
If the registry items are not where you expect in the new OS, how will these radiobuttons get enabled. That being said, I agree your program will not be inoperative because, as you say, you can always select the folders from the directory tree.During program load I check if FS9 is installed. If found, the FS9 radio button is enabled. Then I check for FSX. If found, the FSX radio button is enabled and I check if I find the fsx.cfg and can read the SimObjectPaths entries. If yes, I populate the combo box.
The font in the text boxes in the first line under "current wing_span ..." is larger than that used on the left-hand side of the tab and in the line below. I haven't checked every box.Can you give me an example from your screen at what control the font seems to be smaller and where it seems to be larger, please.

I was not referring to a new version of FS but, rather, to the Vista replacement OS now in beta and due for release in less than a year.
If the registry items are not where you expect in the new OS, how will these radiobuttons get enabled. That being said, I agree your program will not be inoperative because, as you say, you can always select the folders from the directory tree.
The font in the text boxes in the first line under "current wing_span ..." is larger than that used on the left-hand side of the tab and in the line below. I haven't checked every box.
No. I've sent you a screenshot via e-mail. (The forum limits the size of jpgs to an impracticably low resolution for this particular purpose.)You mean the label then?
Jim,
Don and I had a long post exchange on AI-Editor before our discussion went to the open forum. He was only indicating that this would be the last time he was trying to convince me![]()


