• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

Gardermoen 2017 - FSX

Status
Not open for further replies.
@joerlend

On picture 2, there is a sign on the wall that should be taken care of. The sing it self is blue with white text, the were it says 10, that background is red. Could you change that please. Its not grey as you showed it. Except from that, i am now looking forward to have this in my collection, this is very nice. I hardly have words for your work, but it is very, very nice. Keep it up.

G.H.
 
Looking good, Jo! :)
I know its a small detail, but at parking 312 at the VIP terminal (GA-parking) SE-DIR (SAS MD80) is parked for exhibition. It will probably stand there as long as the SAS museum is alive... Would have been a great detail, and a honor for the MD ;)

Marius
 
Did some shadow testing in P3Dv2, hats off to Lockheed for this one!

[youtube]OlHgy_a48o0[/youtube]
 
i want get it until all errors are fixed. Like the runway dont match up, 12 meters from the orginal possition, and there is more, so i'll wait for the fix then i might buy it..
 
So far i have reported over 10 flaws with the new ENGM v2.0, but so far there has been no development in this matter, so i wonder, will there be a fix for all graphicflaws that has been reported? The rnwy needs to be move 12 meters one way and the other like 20 meters. The previous version was better, so i stick to that for now.

G.H.
 
Well, i thought i'd see that day. But so far, there has been no further repsond from the developer in either way's. Seems that we have to live with the graphic flaws in the scenery he made, and there has been no support from him or what so ever since the release of the scenery. That is very impressive i say so, no respond, no mails, no nothing telling us there will be a update to the flaws. Well, i ditched it and went back to Andrew Thomson scenery for ENGM, and trust me guys, this is way better then this.
At least he gives a lot better support then this one does.

G.H.
 
Guys,

Please keep in mind that this is a forum to discuss addon development among developers, not a place to get support for a product. Here in the showroom developers can choose to show their work, but that doesn't oblige them to answer all questions here. If you have questions about a payware product you better report them on the official support site or through the publisher.

Thanks!
 
That is very impressive i say so, no respond, no mails, no nothing telling us there will be a update to the flaws.
Click to expand...

Did you miss this part mister, as i said, there has been no responds from the author in anyway, AEROSOFT don't give support, all they do is telling the user to contact the developer, and thats what i have been doing since the release, and guess what, NO RESPONDS, surprised? Well, i'm not, thats expected to be like this. They develop, they promote, they sell, and NO SUPPORT. So, the best place to do some questioning is in here, right infront of the developer. If you disslike, just delete the post then.
 
Geir Haukland said:
Did you miss this part mister, as i said, there has been no responds from the author in anyway, AEROSOFT don't give support, all they do is telling the user to contact the developer, and thats what i have been doing since the release, and guess what, NO RESPONDS, surprised? Well, i'm not, thats expected to be like this. They develop, they promote, they sell, and NO SUPPORT. So, the best place to do some questioning is in here, right infront of the developer. If you disslike, just delete the post then.
Click to expand...

Do you seriously think anyone will respond to you if you've been this much of a nuisance?? Come on
 
Geir Haukland said:
So, the best place to do some questioning is in here, right infront of the developer. If you disslike, just delete the post then.
Click to expand...

Let me repeat one more time. This is a forum for developers to discuss addon development among each other. This is not a forum for end users to complain about a product, there are enough general FS sites available for that kind of activity. We will close threads that go off topic too much. This forum is not called "Support forum" but "Showroom".

It's the choice of the author to which messages he wishes to reply and to which he doesn't. It's also his choice which reported bugs he fixes and which ones he don't. So if you already tried to contact him in different ways and don't get an answer then you can most likely expect that it will not be changed soon.

And now back to topic please...
 
Geir, if you check the Aerosoft forum you'll see the issues being worked on for the 1.03 fix of the scenery, it's due to be released next week after some more testing. Regarding your problem with the mesh that you e-mailed me about, and I responded to. It's also being added to that patch, like I said in my e-mail.
 
What email? I have not got a such email from you. Don't even try to say that i got one, but i did not. So, whats the excuse this time? Like i said, the airport has been ditched and i am using Andrew's version of ENGM, and it works perfectly to me.
Your version will not be used again, not before the issues has been corrected. I also remember sending you and email about your airport beeing pirated, and there was NO respond to that either. Thank you very much.
I hope you will consider this that in fact the airport is beeing pirated and the security in the pack is not secure enough, maybe time for a stronger messuer Jo Erlend, hardcoded into the airport files that never can be broken, just my five cents.

Now, back to topic.
The v1.0.3, well, i hope the issues that i emailed you are been worked on, and i hope, really hope the rnwy's will be moved to correct location, they were off by 12 meters and 20 meters. ILS landings was way off if you know what i mean.
 
Geir Haukland said:
What email? I have not got a such email from you. Don't even try to say that i got one, but i did not. So, whats the excuse this time? Like i said, the airport has been ditched and i am using Andrew's version of ENGM, and it works perfectly to me.
Your version will not be used again, not before the issues has been corrected. I also remember sending you and email about your airport beeing pirated, and there was NO respond to that either. Thank you very much.
I hope you will consider this that in fact the airport is beeing pirated and the security in the pack is not secure enough, maybe time for a stronger messuer Jo Erlend, hardcoded into the airport files that never can be broken, just my five cents.

Now, back to topic.
The v1.0.3, well, i hope the issues that i emailed you are been worked on, and i hope, really hope the rnwy's will be moved to correct location, they were off by 12 meters and 20 meters. ILS landings was way off if you know what i mean.
Click to expand...


Geir, you are truly unbelievable. I have not seen anybody so ungrateful EVER.

First off, you are making me highly doubt that you actually bought (or acquired) the scenery in the first place, because if you had this masterpiece running on your PC there is no way you would go back to an airport that has a stock AFCAD (no offense Andrew). Secondly, have you seen that almost every high quality airport available has been pirated, and mind you it is near impossible to create an anti pirate protection so strong that it will never be cracked. Plus the people here are 3D artists, not anti pirate programmers.

As Arno said, this is a forum for developers to discuss development, not for end users to complain. I'm sure non developers are always welcome here as long as they contribute by at least complimenting the designers.

So please, from the bottom of my heart, pack up your things and go.




And yes I know this is off topic, sorry
 
OK I am closing this thread. Arno has twice asked for y'all to stay on topic and it seems not to be working. It seems to me that the contents of posts now have gone so far off line that it is unlikely that it can be brought back. It is a shame but enough is enough
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top