• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

FSXA Default CRJ-700 VC rework

Hi Dave,

Real nice effort - not sure how far down the rabbit hole you want to go - IIRC - the CRJ uses FADEC without an auto throttle...

Regards,
Scott


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Hi Dave,

Real nice effort - not sure how far down the rabbit hole you want to go - IIRC - the CRJ uses FADEC without an auto throttle...

Regards,
Scott


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Thanks for the info,
though I didn't really understand the context between FADEC and no auto throttle. Does it mean the A/T is working via another control cirquit seperate from the FADEC?
The auto throttle is kept the default way so far, except the flare code is killing the power before touchdown.
 
Hi Dave,

I'm no expert - as I understand it - while a computer controls the engines - there is no real speed control in level flight - you have to manually adjust the throttle to get desired speed - where it does have some control is in the climb - the engines are set in a known power setting and the autopilot uses pitch to control airspeed... Please take with a grain of salt as it's taken from my experience from the ERJ... I don't believe the default plane emulates this behavior...

Regards,
Scott


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Hi Dave,

I'm no expert - as I understand it - while a computer controls the engines - there is no real speed control in level flight - you have to manually adjust the throttle to get desired speed - where it does have some control is in the climb - the engines are set in a known power setting and the autopilot uses pitch to control airspeed... Please take with a grain of salt as it's taken from my experience from the ERJ... I don't believe the default plane emulates this behavior...

Regards,
Scott


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
well I found a checklist for the CRJ 700 with A/T settings for cruise speed.
 
Forget about FADEC. It's basically a digital engine control instead of cables and pulleys ensuring that the engine runs smoothly in all flight regimes. The simplified engine modeling in MSFS ensures just that.

I've read up a bit on autothrottle on the CRJ. On the small -200 model, the autothrottle is your first officer. The -700 has throttle detents for takeoff, climb, cruise, etc...and a speed hold function that will vary pitch to hold a certain airspeed. Same for the -900. And -1000, apparently. The next best thing with auto throttles in the RJ class is Embraer's ERJ.
Implementing the pitch change funtion is a bit much for a start as you'd basically have to code a PD controller.
 
Forget about FADEC. It's basically a digital engine control instead of cables and pulleys ensuring that the engine runs smoothly in all flight regimes. The simplified engine modeling in MSFS ensures just that.

I've read up a bit on autothrottle on the CRJ. On the small -200 model, the autothrottle is your first officer. The -700 has throttle detents for takeoff, climb, cruise, etc...and a speed hold function that will vary pitch to hold a certain airspeed. Same for the -900. And -1000, apparently. The next best thing with auto throttles in the RJ class is Embraer's ERJ.
Implementing the pitch change funtion is a bit much for a start as you'd basically have to code a PD controller.
That's right. I think unless somebody wants to contribute I will keep the default AP.
 
Hey Dave, I asked my instructor about the HUD and he sended me the actual manual of the thing. I'll PM it to you asap! I hope you can work with it
 
Dave: The modernized CRJ200 cockpits look remarkably similar to the CRJ7 and 9, so you can cross another model off the list by moving the cockpit back a few feet to fit the CRJ2. I think IRIS even made a FSX native freeware model for that one.



The ERJ doesn't have auto throttles - does it ? Been flying the FT ERJ for years...

You're right, they don't. It's the E-Jets that have autothrottle fitted. I always get them mixed up.

According to some PPRuNe and Airliners threads, there's an aftermarket autothrottle for the CRJ-200 available though. Don't know any details though.
 
Sadly not too much to show at the moment but I fiddled a bit with the PFD and made a video demonstrating the Auto Landing Process.


Hope you can withstand the quality :D
 
As for the FMC it is the one by Garrett Smith. His terms of use claimed it not to be included into any release without prior consent and I didn't seem to reach him back in 2014 when I requested this via email (the address was provided in 2008 anyway). So I'm still not sure if I can include the FMC into a releasible version.
Any advice from someone who has an opinion about this case is appreciated. :)
 
If a dev requires consent, but can't be contacted because the provided e-mail address doesn't work, it's not your fault. If you want to stay safe, have users download and install the FMS (it's just a .cab anyway), otherwise include the gauge, give credit where credit is due and always expect an angry mail of the original dev.
 
Very good work man, excellent. Please consider some higher resolution textures as well!
Sorry but improving the textures isn't really one of my talents and at the moment not part of this project. Maybe HD textures (in case I do it I do it 4k) will follow at some time but no promises.
 
This a most awesome project, thank you for taking it.

I will do some experimentation with the default cockpit textures, and if they work out I'll share with you. I'm just not 100% sure if the resolution can be improved without the VC .mdl "knowing it". As soon as I free up some time I will give it a try.
 
This a most awesome project, thank you for taking it.
I will do some experimentation with the default cockpit textures, and if they work out I'll share with you. I'm just not 100% sure if the resolution can be improved without the VC .mdl "knowing it". As soon as I free up some time I will give it a try.
Nice someone is taking that task too.
The mdl doesn't have to know about the resolution ;)
 
Back
Top