Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.
By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

Thanks for the info,Hi Dave,
Real nice effort - not sure how far down the rabbit hole you want to go - IIRC - the CRJ uses FADEC without an auto throttle...
Regards,
Scott
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


well I found a checklist for the CRJ 700 with A/T settings for cruise speed.Hi Dave,
I'm no expert - as I understand it - while a computer controls the engines - there is no real speed control in level flight - you have to manually adjust the throttle to get desired speed - where it does have some control is in the climb - the engines are set in a known power setting and the autopilot uses pitch to control airspeed... Please take with a grain of salt as it's taken from my experience from the ERJ... I don't believe the default plane emulates this behavior...
Regards,
Scott
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


That's right. I think unless somebody wants to contribute I will keep the default AP.Forget about FADEC. It's basically a digital engine control instead of cables and pulleys ensuring that the engine runs smoothly in all flight regimes. The simplified engine modeling in MSFS ensures just that.
I've read up a bit on autothrottle on the CRJ. On the small -200 model, the autothrottle is your first officer. The -700 has throttle detents for takeoff, climb, cruise, etc...and a speed hold function that will vary pitch to hold a certain airspeed. Same for the -900. And -1000, apparently. The next best thing with auto throttles in the RJ class is Embraer's ERJ.
Implementing the pitch change funtion is a bit much for a start as you'd basically have to code a PD controller.

The next best thing with auto throttles in the RJ class is Embraer's ERJ.

The ERJ doesn't have auto throttles - does it ? Been flying the FT ERJ for years...






Sorry but improving the textures isn't really one of my talents and at the moment not part of this project. Maybe HD textures (in case I do it I do it 4k) will follow at some time but no promises.Very good work man, excellent. Please consider some higher resolution textures as well!


Nice someone is taking that task too.This a most awesome project, thank you for taking it.
I will do some experimentation with the default cockpit textures, and if they work out I'll share with you. I'm just not 100% sure if the resolution can be improved without the VC .mdl "knowing it". As soon as I free up some time I will give it a try.