• Which the release of FS2020 we see an explosition of activity on the forun and of course we are very happy to see this. But having all questions about FS2020 in one forum becomes a bit messy. So therefore we would like to ask you all to use the following guidelines when posting your questions:

    • Tag FS2020 specific questions with the MSFS2020 tag.
    • Questions about making 3D assets can be posted in the 3D asset design forum. Either post them in the subforum of the modelling tool you use or in the general forum if they are general.
    • Questions about aircraft design can be posted in the Aircraft design forum
    • Questions about airport design can be posted in the FS2020 airport design forum. Once airport development tools have been updated for FS2020 you can post tool speciifc questions in the subforums of those tools as well of course.
    • Questions about terrain design can be posted in the FS2020 terrain design forum.
    • Questions about SimConnect can be posted in the SimConnect forum.

    Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.

    By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

P3D v5 rectangle exclude and autogen

OK - I am not going any further than stating what I have stated many times from my experience. FS9 exclusion rectangle appear to reliably exclude autogen when set to exclude all. I have personally seen this.

As for FSX and later they will not reliably exclude autogen. My experience of this goes back to 2006 when we first got FSX and I'm not going back to try and find the conversations about it. They appear to work sometimes and not others on FSX. I have not tested this on P3D and don't intend to.

Finally since 2006 we have known that exclusion rectangles which overlap and (probably) have different flag settings can cause unexpected results, That is the exclude may not behave as expected in terms of what gets excluded. They can also cancel each other out. Again I am not back to find the conversation about it but I can tell you that Jim Vile alerted me to the issue at the time when we were developing ADE.

So the bottom line is if you want to exclude autogen use a terrain based exclusion. Doing anything else is a waste of time.

That's it gentlemen. I wish you joy of your investigations :)
 
now the project is released and the files are available for everyone, you can check it yourself, and please note:
only difference between these two afсads is the quantity exclusion rectangles, in ok.bgl 34 small rectangles and one large one that covers them vis only 1 large rectangles in no_autogen.bgl, it's all the difference...
But in ok.bgl there is an autogen, and in no_autogen.bgl, respectively, no...
p/s I use P4(in Р5 the same problem) only for the test, therefore sim full stock( no any addons)+autogen setings max.
---
ok.bgl:
ok.bgl.png
---
no_autogen.bgl:
no_autogen.bgl.png
---

So the bottom line is if you want to exclude autogen use a terrain based exclusion. Doing anything else is a waste of time.
yes it is, but it's important to remember this:
we have known that exclusion rectangles which overlap and (probably) have different flag settings can cause unexpected results, That is the exclude may not behave as expected in terms of what gets excluded.
so if suddenly your autogen has disappeared and you did not use exclusion polygons, check if, perhaps the reason for the problem is in what it should not be, namely: im exclusion rectangles, sometimes they may not work as expected ( in terms of what gets excluded. ).
and this is not the first problem of incorrect work of SDK;(
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Back
Top