- Messages
- 34,981
- Country

is that a good idea? I would find it VERY helpful...
I would take 'not yet' to mean that it is on the development program but has not been implemented so far and will not be in the next release.
Any other question that is not specific to an aspect of development or tool can be posted in the General chat forum.
By following these guidelines we make sure that the forums remain easy to read for everybody and also that the right people can find your post to answer it.

is that a good idea? I would find it VERY helpful...


I did find, unless I have overlooked a built-in feature, that it would be handy, when bringing up a specific approach for editing or additions, that the waypoints/fixes involved in that particular approach be linked together with lines as they typically are on instrument approach/SID charts.
Things around busy areas get real busy (many waypoints/fixes) and scattered, and it would be real nice to see the approach-of-interest highlighted and connected. Also of great interest is something showing the DISTANCE between the fixes as typically appears on the approach charts.
Maybe I have missed something in 1.39, but I tried to find distance information and could not. Short of doing the lat-long calculations----

1.40 dynamically draws approaches in a similar way to the FSX GPS.
See above
Guidelines provide distance and heading information. 1.40 contains guidelines in Approach Mode that are measured in nautical miles and have the option of magentic heading.
1.40 is the next full release but we may make a beta available to this community with this functionality in before we go to public release

Doh! I should have read the post(s) above a little better. Looks like guidelines aligned to the runway centerlines in approach mode are already on the way!!

when does 1.40 come out for the FSDeveloper community??

Jon: This may already have been mentioned in this thread or elsewhere, so please disregard if in the works.
It would be nice to be able to size generic buildings to a tenth. Currently, if you add a generic building and resize, to say 10.5 x 11.2, when you go back to the building it shows only the whole number and not the decimal.
Thanks and I look forward to the release of 1.40.
kagazi
If it is possible, a way to make a universal change to the taxiway lighting and markings for an entire airport.

Make it more easy to manage parking spots and there Airlines connected to them. Some kind of a export list or any other way possiable for someone to make sure that you hav'nt forgotten any Airline company at any gate, without going though all the parking spots one by one.
Remove the autocelection/highlight when moveing the mouse over any object, apron, gate ect. To me it is confussing when working with two objects close to each other, that the nearby object is flickering every time the mouse moves over the object that I not editing.
Maybe it is just me... but compared to FSX-planner, I find it way difficult to change a path or taxiway from lets say, Cement to Asfahlt. To be unnest... I open FSX-planner eveytime just to do that, as I hav'nt fund the way i ADE![]()

I'm not sure I understand. You can list all parking spots from the List Menu and that will tell you what airlines are assigned to which parking spot. This report can be exported to a comma delimited file or printed (as can all lists). Or is the suggestion that we have a list by airline code that shows which parking spots are assigned to that airline? If so then I can add that to the list.Make it more easy to manage parking spots and there Airlines connected to them. Some kind of a export list or any other way possiable for someone to make sure that you hav'nt forgotten any Airline company at any gate, without going though all the parking spots one by one.![]()


Regarding 3.: What ever I do... double click, right click and select edit or even hit enter when a path is selected, I don't get any options to edit the surface. I get a properties window where I can edit "Designator, Type, Width and lights for left and right edges" nothing more ?